There are, in fact, several types of IT products that could require some level
of safety documentation - see Aus/NZ 3000.

The path of least resistance is to have whatever body issues the CB test cert
do all of the country-specific stuff.

Brian 


From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Kevin Richardson
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 1:37 PM
To: Knighten, Jim L; Dan Roman; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: Australia Requiems for ITE Equipment

Christine, 

Jim is correct.  The Australian regulations require the local manufacturer,
importer or the appointed Agent of the local manufacturer or importer be
responsible for compliance of the produce supplied in Australia.  As such,
they must assemble the necessary compliance documentation (i.e. product
Compliance Folder) and then sign a Declaration of Conformity (DoC).  In
addition, which ever it is making the DoC, the product must display their ACMA
Supplier Code Number (SCN).

Therefore, if you are an overseas manufacturer/supplier who does not have a
registered business presence in Australia importing your own product, each and
every importer of your product must take responsibility for the product they
import and supply (i.e. establish a product Compliance Folder, sign a DoC and
ensure the product is labelled with their ACMA SCN and only their SCN). 
Seemingly complicated I know. 

The easiest and greatest benefit approach for overseas manufacturers/suppliers
to access the Australian market if they do not have a local office or do not
with a local office to be the importer of their product is for the overseas
manufacturer/supplier to enter into an 'arrangement' with a company in
Australia offering 'Agent' service.  Then, providing each of their importers
agree to enter into an 'Agency agreement' with that same Agent, the overseas
manufacturer/supplier only need deal with a single entity in terms of
compliance of their product and also the bit plus it all product can be
labelled with a single SCN, i.e. the Agent's, instead of a different SCN for
each of the importers.

Finally, concerning the comments about electrical safety, it is true that
electrical safety approval is not covered by either the A-Tick or the C-Tick. 
A separate and formal approval is required in some instances but general not
for ITE.  The only item at the moment that MUST be approved is an external
power supply (i.e. typical laptop type PSU).  this device is a "Declared
Article" according to the electrical regulations in each State/Territory of
Australia and as such must have a "Certificate of Suitability" issued for the
the PSU.

There are moves afoot to change the electrical regulations significantly
which, when introduced, will introduce rather sweeping changes.  The ACMA are
also looking at the possibility of moving to a single mark although if
introduced will most likely be synchronised to coincide with the introduction
of the new electrical regulations because they are both likely to then require
the use of the "Regulatory Compliance Mark" (RCM).  At the moment, use of the
RCM is outlined in AS/NZS 4417 series of standards.

Best regards, 
Kevin Richardson 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@socal.rr.com>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to