I believe the intention has always been to test line-to-ground (normal mode)
and then neutral-ground (common mode). It's been a few years since I was
convenor of that group and don't recall all the discussions. I believe
coupling multiple lines may have been discussed, but there are real problems
producing the proper waveforms for all conditions == especially for 3-phase
systems where multiple lines can be involved in a common mode test. Of
course, a product standard could require the line + neutral to ground tests,
but I'm not aware of any that do. If they did, I wouldn't guarantee the
waveforms to be correct from all generators under this condition. I believe
that the single line to ground common mode test has been around since the
old 801-5. 

In the US, ANSI/IEEE and many companies take the position that the transient
can come in any way it wants to, so line + neutral to ground is commonly
(excuse the PUN) done.

In section 8 of Edition 2 it's stated that for a.c. power ports five
positive and five negative pulses each at 0º, 90º, 180º and at 270º shall
be
done....  So I'd say 180 IS a test as is 0 degrees...


Note 2 of that section also states that, "Product committees may select
different phase angles and either increase or reduce the number of surges
per phase..."


Hope this is helpful....


Michael Hopkins
Amber Precision Instruments
Office: +1 603 595 6420
Mobile: +1 603 765 3736
m...@amberpi.com


From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Derek Walton
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 11:22 AM
To: IEEE EMC Discussion Group
Subject: Surge testing Questions

Good day folks,

I have a question or two concerning the latest surge test document 
EN61000-4-5:

1) when the pulse is applied on a power lead between line and ground, is 
it done Line to ground, then Neutral to Ground OR, is it Line and 
Neutral to Ground.

One would think if this were a common mode test ( since it's referenced 
to Ground ) that the pulse be applied Line and Neutral to ground 
simultaneously. However, the wording in -5 clause 8.2 states 
*successively *implying Line to ground then Neutral to ground. This 
implies separate tests.

2) On an AC waveform, is the 180 degree position a test condition? I ask 
because it states Zero crossing point. If this is NOT.... where is the 
exemption?

Many thanks in advance.

Derek Walton
L F Research

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that
URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@ptcnh.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@ptcnh.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to