Too much time to think while I pound out these mindless compliance reports that no (sane) person will read. A colleague gave me the latest issue of an ECN magazine article by John Titus. <www.ecnmag.com/articles/2011/12/titus-on-Design-Was-Lead-Free-Solder-Worth- the-Effort/>
And we cannot say that was just another unintended affect. I read the similar stuff from approx 2003 to 2005. So if the assertion that lead-free is not net-good for the planet is valid, what would it take to rescind? Or is this another permanent temporary tax? Expect to hear more drivel today - I am at the keyboard. All. Day. Long. Brian - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
