In message
<99280a01673ff44180f15babb58896ca091b2ae...@troyex2.itwfeg.biz>, dated
Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Richard Pittenger <richard.pitten...@hobartcorp.com>
writes:
NRTL ?E? is objecting to use of this material for this application but
so far has not provided a reason. Can any of you think of a reason why
a plastic film with a VTM-2 flame rating shouldn?t be used as an
electrical barrier?
Surely it's up to the NRTL to say why they object. It might be because
the part could be removed during servicing and not replaced.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
The longer it takes to make a point, the more obtuse it proves to be.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
