Thanks! I see the 'intended function' ... Agree that Item A should be handled as a radio product. But it will be hard to make compliance to radio standards since the product Item, A is only a part of a total radio systems. Radio parameters according to ETSI / EN standards will not be able to check before a complete systems (Item A + B) is running. These parameters will not be able to check before the complete system is running.
Let me just comment that Item A is made by a single manufacturer and Item B is made by manufacturer B and there are many possible Item B's on the market. Testing out all possible configurations of Itema A + Item B is considered unacceptable, since it will cover 95% of configurations which never will be used and it would also cost a huge amount of $$. Thanks. #Amund -----Opprinnelig melding----- Fra: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk] Sendt: 19. mars 2013 20:42 Til: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Emne: Re: [PSES] RTTE - Radio product or not In message <3f0347ac6ed9504191f91f07629fbb0c01540...@thhsle14mbx2.hslive.net>, dated Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Charlie Blackham <char...@sulisconsultants.com> writes: > >Product B isn’t a radio without product A attached, therefore product A >is part of a radio system and the R&TTE Directive applies. I would tentatively agree: in CENELEC long ago, the question was (half seriously) raised as to whether a washing machine with a microprocessor was a household appliance or ITE. The answer was that the 'intended function' is definitive. I think this can be extended to products like A and B, which are not intended to work alone but are components of a system. The 'intended function' of the system is a radio, so the component parts are 'radio'. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk SHOCK HORROR! Dinosaur-like DNA found in chicken and turkey meals John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com> - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
