Hi Brian,

Standard IEC 60950-1 only allows  use of MOV or combination MOV + GDT in 
primary circuit. No other surge protectors are allowed.

As you mentioned, manufacturers are mostly using T protection (2 MOVs and one 
GDT).
Best regards,
Bostjan


On 9. sep. 2013, at 18:00, "Cortland Richmond" 
<k...@earthlink.net<mailto:k...@earthlink.net>> wrote:

Some years ago I was working at in a wireline telecomms equipment maker.  
Robust protection was the order of the day; the outside physical plant was just 
*waiting* for lightning.

We protected each circuit to a level it could withstand, and worked back to the 
line inputs, where (IIRC) we had to withstand 2 KV Oc or 500 Amp short circuit 
lightning transients.   It helped that everything in the Central Office had a 
common-point ground, even if it was 150 feet below, in the basement, as this 
made backdoor entry less likely.

In a later incarnation, I found aviation customers who wanted to test transient 
protection without opening the equipment, which is another story -- and on 
these, we had to inject transients on the CASE.

I suggested some commercially available modules for AC power protection here 
because one does NOT want to try to protect the AC power network, only what he 
builds, and just throwing in spark gaps, gas tubes, Tranzorbs(tm) or MOV's 
might be asking for trouble. Know the threat, and protect against THAT.

Cortland Richmond


On 9/9/2013 1130, Kunde, Brian wrote:
What are the safety considerations using gas tubes on the AC mains? Do you have 
to fuse them or are they not likely to fail shorted? Can you use them between 
line and PE? Do you have to use multiple parts in series? I often see them in 
series with MOVs in a “T” configuration to protect against line to line and 
line to PE surges.

A few year back we had a product that had several surge suppression circuits 
located on different PC boards within (some assemblies were very expensive and 
we wanted to protect them). Well, at our customer site they experienced some 
kind of huge surge, transient or overvoltage (we do not know what exactly 
happened). Of all the equipment that was on-site including many of our 
competitors equipment, only our instrument was damaged. Our surge suppressors 
were blown up, charred, and/or vaporized.  The warranty repair cost was 
$10,000US but the hit to our reputation was probably worst. We believed that 
our equipment probably protected all the other equipment on-site but it is hard 
to get your customers to believe you. So now we want to better control our 
surge protection and if we see a huge surge we hope it to destroy something 
much less expensive to replace or at least minimize the damage.

What we are currently thinking is to use over the counter Surge Suppressor 
modules, but they are only good to about 3KV – 4KV. Then we thought we would 
add a spark-gap in the board that would only kick in if our surge suppressors 
failed. Maybe we can add some very high voltage Gas Tubes also or instead of 
the spark-gap.  I’m not sure what more we can do. Many of the 
circuits/assemblies we are trying to protect are buy/sell components where we 
do not control spacings.

Any comments?

Thanks to all.

The Other Brian


-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org<mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net<mailto:emcp...@radiusnorth.net>>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org<mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org<mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org>>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com<mailto:dhe...@gmail.com>>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to