Cannot comment on BS7671 or IEC60364, but all North American building codes 
(e.g., NEC article 240) have overcurrent protection requirements for panels, 
cords, fixture wires, OCPDs, etc. 

Also, ITE and A/V standards talk about this stuff. As usual, the test equipment 
community makes basic stuff confusing. At least I am confused...

Brian 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk] 
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 9:32 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Concerning EN 61010-1, §9.6 Overcurrent protection

In message 
<435656780.4337510.1383321906804.javamail.r...@sz0110a.emeryville.ca.mail
.comcast.net>, dated Fri, 1 Nov 2013, Mike Sherman ----- Original 
Message ----- <msherma...@comcast.net> writes:

>If you think of "non-permanently connected equipment" as cord-and-plug 
>connected equipment, it is not uncommon for cord-and-plug connected 
>equipment to rely upon the facility mains overcurrent protection (i.e., 
>a circuit breaker in a distribution panel).

Yes, it is, but the idea of requiring manufacturers of equipment to 
instruct users to install over-current protection in the building is not 
sensible. Such an instruction would not be acted on.

And indeed, 9.6.3 seems to say that it is prohibited to a supply an 
over-current protection device as a separate object from the device to 
be protected. It is not clear how such a prohibition could be justified 
other than holding that the user might remove it. Is that more likely 
than the user not acting on the instruction to modify the building 
installation?

There is another discussion going on elsewhere about similar texts in 
IEC/EN 60950-1 and IEC 62368-1. A general re-think about how to write 
the provisions in this are is required.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Nondum ex silvis sumus
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to