Hi Ravinder,

James's comment made me wonder about a statement you made about rise times 
being the same. Are you sure what you are seeing isn't the limit of your 
measuring technique? A broader noise spectrum may be due to a faster rise time 
that you are not seeing in the time domain. I too have observed that flip chips 
exhibit more heat-sink coupling.


Also, do not rely on data sheets for these numbers, they can differ wildly.


Can you alter the behavior of the chip to determine if one section of circuitry 
is responsible? e.g. output buffers..


Are the emissions from the whole package? do any of the signals from the ASIC 
leave the PWB?  I recall fixing a problem with a board where the ASIC powered a 
front panel LED. That LED didn't rearly need the nS rise times from the ASIC.

Keep posting clues...


Sincerely,


Derek
L F Research.


-----Original Message-----
From: Pawson, James <james.paw...@echostar.com>
To: EMC-PSTC <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sent: Mon, Mar 24, 2014 4:46 am
Subject: Re: [PSES] Higher EMI from ASIC built with new process



Hello Ravinder,
 
I wasn’t going to answer this as you were asking the experts ;)
 
Flip chips couple very well into their heatsinks compared to older wirebond 
packages as the silicon is much closer to the top surface. Perhaps try 
grounding/decoupling the heatsink or changing to a ceramic material for 
diagnosis of the problem?
 
Also, the package bond inductance will probably have reduced. You could look at 
increasing the decoupling, especially on any digital core and driver pins.
 
Has the manufacturer provided updated reference schematics for the new chip?
 
Rgds
James Pawson
EchoStar Europe
 
From: ravinder.ajm...@hgst.com [mailto:ravinder.ajm...@hgst.com]
Sent: 23 March 2014 01:39
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Higher EMI from ASIC built with new process
 

Hi Experts,

I am comparing EMI from two ASICs.  Both have identical rise/fall times and 
signal amplitude.  Yet the ASIC built with the later technology not only has 
significantly higher radiated emissions, but also shows much broader noise 
spectrum.  PCB stackup and layout is identical.  Please help me understand what 
other factors can be responsible for this anomaly.

The older ASIC uses a wirebond package, whereas the new ASIC has flip chip 
package.

Regards
Ravinder Ajmani
HGST, a Western Digital company
5601 Great Oaks Pkwy
San Jose, CA 95119-1003
ravinder.ajm...@hgst.com
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
&LT;emc-p...@ieee.org&GT;
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web 
at:http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.
Website:      http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules:     http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas &LT;emcp...@radiusnorth.net&GT;
Mike Cantwell &LT;mcantw...@ieee.org&GT;
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher  &LT;j.bac...@ieee.org&GT;
David Heald &LT;dhe...@gmail.com&GT;


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to