Pressure vessels typically require compliance with the PED 97/23/EC (Pressure Equipment Directive). Another option is the TPED 2010/35/EU (Transportable Pressure Equipment Directive). One could argue that there could be a difference between pressure vessels needing to be occasionally transported and a vessel designed to be routinely transported. In other words, can a PED compliant vessel be transported with supplementary protection such as a robust shipping container or the enclosure itself? Is the intent of the TPED (Pi mark) reserved for vessels routinely filled and transported unprotected as one would find with an oxygen or acetylene tank.
Thanks - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
