In message
<616d251d1a9e498e9bb4e5a8568fc...@blupr01mb147.prod.exchangelabs.com>,
dated Mon, 21 Apr 2014, Rick Busche <rick.bus...@qnergy.com> writes:
In other words, can a PED compliant vessel be transported with
supplementary protection such as a robust shipping container or the
enclosure itself?
Since the pressure vessels must be transported from where they are made
to where they are used, that must be permitted!
Is the intent of the TPED (Pi mark) reserved for vessels routinely
filled and transported unprotected as one would find with an oxygen or
acetylene tank.
You need to read the Directive and form your own judgement. Your
understanding might be different from mine.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Nondum ex silvis sumus
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
