I was at a symposium recently where hundreds of (strictly non-electrical or
otherwise powered) puzzles and games were being rated (for aesthetics such
as age level, fun and intellectual challenge). However, nobody at this event
gave any consideration to the familiar regulatory compliance issues such as
choke hazard, biological safety, stored energy or “unintentional uses.”

 

I began thinking about this when I examined a very simple toy consisting of
16 equal ¼” diameter, 4” long polystyrene tubes strung in series on a thin
bungee cord. The string of tubes can be torqued into forming many (over 200
claimed) stable “wire frame” three dimensional objects. I was sitting there,
twisting this thing into cubes and polyhedrons, when I realized that it
could also form a very credible slingshot! I then noticed a very prominent
“CE” on the box. 

 

I wonder if anyone in our group has ever done a product compliance with the
Toy Directive. Maybe my background in defense is showing, but it seems to me
that only a great toy can stimulate, amuse, educate and also be converted to
a weapon.

 

Ed Price
WB6WSN
Chula Vista, CA USA



 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to