In message
<a715ba4131300542ad54080461296a8c015de...@wpusstl010.main.root.tac.com>,
dated Wed, 13 May 2015, kevin.mccandl...@schneider-electric.com writes:
was taught that when using harmonized standards to justify Presumption
of Conformity, you must use the most relevant standard to your
product/application.
So if there is a product/family standard that obviously applies to your
product, you should use it as opposed to a generic standard.
Is that documented? Or is it just a rule of thumb?
Neither, really. A product (-family) standard 'takes precedence' over a
generic standard, but in principle a manufacturer can apply any standard
and then seek to justify the choice in the EMC assessment.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
When I turn my back on the sun, it's to look for a rainbow
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
