On Wed, 13 May 2015 15:35:23 -0500, kevin.mccandl...@schneider-electric.com wrote:
> I was taught that when using harmonized standards to justify Presumption > of Conformity, you must use the most relevant standard to your > product/application. > > So if there is a product/family standard that obviously applies to your > product, you should use it as opposed to a generic standard. > > Is that documented? Or is it just a rule of thumb? CENELEC Guide 25 has some explanations on the topic. http://www.cenelec.eu/membersandexperts/referencematerial/cenelecguides.html Regards, Tom - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
