Recently a customer has corrected the markings of terminal blocks inside of an 
industrial control panel my company built.  An NRTL has evaluated the system 
and says the terminal markings for Line (L), Neutral (N), and Ground (G) are 
incorrect for a 220VAC input condition.  Their evaluation says that N is 
incorrect and should be labeled (L2) and the Line as (L1).  I agree that this 
is technically corrected for a North American wired 220VAC input as it consists 
of 2 live wires, each 110VAC.  For international use, 220VAC is only on one leg 
(L) and the return is (N).  This system is capable of handling 90-240VAC 
single-phase input, but the customer has been instructed by the NRTL that for 
110VAC input the terminals should be marked L/N/PE, and for 220VAC input the 
terminals should be marked L1/L2/PE.  This would require different construction 
for North America and International use.  Do I have an argument that the NRTL 
has made an incorrect assessment?

Thanks,
John Cochran
Strongarm Energy Division
STRONGARM Designs
423 Sargon Way, Horsham, PA 19044
Ph: 215-443-3400 x219   Fax: 215-443-3002
jcoch...@strongarm.com<mailto:jcoch...@strongarm.com>


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to