It sounds complying UL 2272 still fails to convince stopping catch fire completely. Let see later how the new products perform.
Scott On 14/7/2016, 3:34 AM, "Brian O'Connell" <oconne...@tamuracorp.com> wrote: While NRTLs are allowed to apply just about any standard deemed 'necessary', should be noted that 2272 not yet recognized by ANSI. My opinion - no discernable rationale for a new and separate safety standard for "electric-powered self-balancing scooters". The 2272 proposed standard is essentially make-work and worthless because it purposely ignored assessment of the product category's principle defining features. Perhaps UL had no choice because the UL696 scope is worthless for other than AC -mains connected stuff. But it does have this statement: "For a toy that mimics the form or function of an established general-use appliance, the established requirements applicable to the general-use appliance shall be considered in defining the particular requirements applicable to the toy." In any case look at EN15194 and 50272-3, and UL2271 and 2580. Brian From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 7:17 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Applicable standards for hoverboard in EU Within EU, the most relevant directive for hoverboard is MD 2006/42/EC. What is the applicable standard to evaluate the mechanical part? Is it possible to use UL 2272 that is the latest US standard for this type of product? The new cast directive allows to use national standard if there is no harmonized standard. In electrical part and charger, should we apply EN 60204-1 or EN 60950-1 and EN 60335-2-29 or EN 61558-2-6? If there is remote control via Bluetooth with mobile phone, should RED/R&TTED be applied instead of all above standards for electrical part? Your guidance on compliance with this type of products is appreciated! Thanks and regards, Scott - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com> - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
