This seems to imply that as long as your sticking a device normally subject to 
the published limits and tests can be ignored if it is going into a large 
industrial park. So for example and automated box sealing equipment located 
inside of an industrial part is exempted from the limits and tests normally 
associated with digital equipment. There is still the caveat that it can't 
interfere but I assume that this would only happen because of a complaint from 
adjacent users. How about theme parks etc. The public utilities in the US have 
many exemptions to the regulations but not industrial locations. I presumed 
that testing in those case for large equipment that didn't fit in a chamber was 
subject to at least in-situ testing. But I'm clueless how those measurements 
would include or exclude the devices EMC performance.
15.103 Exempted devices.
The following devices are subject only to the general conditions of operation 
in ยงยง15.5 and 15.29 and are exempt from the specific technical standards and 
other requirements contained in this part. The operator of the exempted device 
shall be required to stop operating the device upon a finding by the Commission 
or its representative that the device is causing harmful interference. 
Operation shall not resume until the condition causing the harmful interference 
has been corrected. Although not mandatory, it is strongly recommended that the 
manufacturer of an exempted device endeavor to have the device meet the 
specific technical standards in this part.
(a) A digital device utilized exclusively in any transportation vehicle 
including motor vehicles and aircraft.
(b) A digital device used exclusively as an electronic control or power system 
utilized by a public utility or in an industrial plant. The term public utility 
includes equipment only to the extent that it is in a dedicated building or 
large room owned or leased by the utility and does not extend to equipment 
installed in a subscriber's facility.


Gary McInturff
Reliability/Compliance Engineer












Esterline Interface Technologies

            Featuring
ADVANCED INPUT, GAMESMAN, LRE MEDICAL, and MEMTRON  products

600 W. Wilbur AvenueCoeur d'Alene, ID  83815-9496
Toll Free: 800-444-5923
Tel:  (208) 635-8306
www.esterline.com/interfacetechnologies<http://www.esterline.com/interfacetechnologies>
Technology, Innovation, Performance...
"Information in or attached to this e-mail message may be subject to export 
control restrictions of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) 
(22 CFR pts. 120-130) or the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) (15 CFR 
pts. 730-774).  Before exporting this information outside the United States or 
releasing it to a foreign person in the United States, you need to determine 
whether a license under the EAR or the ITAR is required to do so.  If you have 
any questions about this obligation, please contact me."
Click 
here<http://www.esterline.com/governance/email_disclaimer/tabid/1532/Default.aspx>
 to read disclaimer






-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to