Ken

 

I understand where you were coming from - my "defence", if it may be called
that, was that it looked like these (likely to be inadequately-equipped for
NVG operations) vehicles were going to be used a lot at night by
inadequately-trained operators in very difficult and challenging Afghanistan
terrain (you only had to see some of the photos that we were shown of severe
accidents that had already happened in daylight to immediately understand
that!). 

 

Therefore serious, likely some fatal, accidents were going to happen PDQ if
the issues were not properly addressed before the vehicles and operators
were sent there - and this was at a time when there were very serious public
concerns about the numbers of British troops already being injured and
killed in that country.

 

John E Allen

W.London, UK

 

From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com] 
Sent: 27 December 2016 19:09
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Practical ethics? -- text version

 

"If neither customer nor supplier wanted what you were selling, then the
personal fallout to you is not surprising, regardless of how important the
feature was/is.

Faced with a similar situation, I have taken a less extreme approach.

..This is where John Allen and I part company. Faced with this level of
short-sighted stupidity, I gave up reasoning with them and went into
personal protection mode, as detailed above.  There was no point at tilting
at the windmill any longer. It was clearly a windmill, not a dragon and it
wasn't going anywhere. The Serenity Prayer comes to mind here, even if you
are a radical atheist - it applies."

Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261



  _____  

From: John Allen <john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk>
Reply-To: John Allen <john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 17:53:28 -0000
To: <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: Re: [PSES] Practical ethics? -- text version

Ken

Take your point to a degree, but the fact of the matter was that neither our
customer nor the MoD wanted to take the responsibility until pushed very
hard by me - which left me in the "middle of the deep blue sea" and without
much of a "paddle".
 
Luckily for the project, in this case, events worked out OK - but unluckily
not for me personally (having taken what I considered to be the ethical
stance) L.
 
John E Allen
W. London 
 

From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com] 
Sent: 27 December 2016 15:51
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Practical ethics? -- text version

War definitely puts a stress on the procurement process.  That process was
not designed to field things quickly (speaking as a citizen of the USA).  A
wartime procurement does require some intelligent analysis of what can be
streamlined and what is ironclad.

In this case of NVG compatibility, the MoD might have been contacted to get
their take on it, they being the customer.  If they can't be convinced to
sign up to it, the vendor can't be held accountable.  If they do want it,
and it wasn't in the original contract, then it is time for an engineering
change order, more money and time for the vendor and everyone is happy...

One way or the other it will get done; it's just more efficient to take care
of it up front.

Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261

  _____  

From: John Allen <john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 15:39:02 -0000
To: 'Ken Javor' <ken.ja...@emccompliance.com>, <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: RE: [PSES] Practical ethics? -- text version

Ken
 
You are almost certainly correct on all counts - UK MoD Requirements specs
have often been deficient, especially if someone boiler-plated them from
another project, and then didn't get to think about the detail of what might
actually be required, such the use of NVG in this case.
 
Even "worse" was that those armoured tractors were purchased under an Urgent
Operational Requirements (UOR) contract, which probably meant "get them PDQ
& bu**ger the details", which meant that various people were under pressure
to deliver quickly and be "amenable" to "short-cuts" where they thought
these were of little consequence &/or would not be noticed (except by the
likes of myself!).
 
Nevertheless, in the wider context, this sort of thing can place a great
strain on the ethics of the "guy in the middle" who understands what
actually needs to be done and "speaks his mind", but is then put under
considerable pressure from various sides to be less "proscriptive"/
"demanding".
 
What actually happens then is the result of just how far both sides are
prepared push their arguments, and with what amounts of pressure and
influence - Decades ago, a company I worked for had an MD who said something
like "I'll sign the certificates because that's what I get paid for", but
rarely if ever actually asked for any supporting evidence. Ethics? What
ethics?
 
John E Allen
W. London, UK
 

From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com] 
Sent: 27 December 2016 15:08
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Practical ethics? -- text version

I may be missing something here, but anything the Army procures that might
be used around NVG has to be NVG-use qualified. Sounds as if someone dropped
the ball levying that requirement in this situation. The system is broken if
there is no contractual requirement and the entire thing hangs on one
engineer's knowledge and integrity.

Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261 

  _____  


From: John Allen <john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk>
Reply-To: John Allen <john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 10:12:53 -0000
To: <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: Re: [PSES] Practical ethics? -- text version

I had similar problems with customers as well, especially when the company I
worked for was doing sub-contract Safety Case work for a supplier of
armoured tractors for the UK MoD!
 
Neither our customer "wanted to know" when I raised some safety-related
"issues" about issues about the tractors and what they were going to be used
for in Kandahar province during the time the Royal Engineers were working
there to support UK ground forces in the fight against the Taliban, such as
the following question: "These vehicles will be used at night with night
vision goggles (NVG), and so have the users been trained in using them at
night with such goggles?" 
(if you thought even slightly "hard" about the subject you could foresee a
lot of very realistic hazardous situations!)

The initial, and for a long time, response was simply that the troops had
been trained to use NVG ("and that was good enough") - but, as the Safety
Case Engineer on the project, I could not "let go" of the issue until I
considered that it was well on the way to being dealt with.
 
It took about a year, but, finally, "someone" in the Army decided that they
would have to do night-time trials with those vehicles using NVG, and I
think that they were then "rather surprised" to find out that there were a
lot of unforeseen and hazardous issues with trying to use them under the
typical operating conditions - so much so that they mandated that similar
trials should be performed on any vehicle type to be used with NVG.
 
There were also a number of other, sometimes less potentially serious,
hazard issues with those projects that I did not "let go of" until I
considered they were well on the way to being solved, and, generally, they
were.
 
You could say that I had been "vindicated", but all the above cut little ice
with the MoD project team or our direct sub-contract customer, and the
latter then stated emphatically that they did not want me working on any
future safety case project for them! That, of course, made me "less than
popular" with my own company's management, and resulted in my being given
little or no new "chargeable" work for most of the rest of the time I worked
for them, which, in turn, made my situation there far more stressful L.
 
"Ethics" versus "personal survival"???
 
John E Allen
W. London, UK
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Cortland Richmond [mailto:k...@earthlink.net] 
Sent: 27 December 2016 00:35
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Practical ethics? -- text version
 
One problem for engineers is that they work for people whose intent is to
make money, and who are remarkably resistant to spending any more than is
necessary to barely meet requirements and get products on the market. That
is actually forgivable; what isn't forgivable is a willingness to accept not
meeting performance, regulatory, or even safety requirements, accepting
settlements and fines as part of the cost of doing business to make a little
more on each unit that goes out the door. I wonder if ethics classes are
doing anything to fix that.
 
Ethics Lesson: Many years ago, late at night, an armed helicopter landed at
a base where I was stationed, with a radio problem that kept the pilot from
talking to troops under attack. I was unable to fix the problem no matter
what I replaced, and over the next few days, no one else in our maintenance
shop could figure it out either.
 
But soldiers probably died that night because their close air support was
gone.
 
Finally, I had the crew-chief run the rotor speed up to what the pilot had
reported and, at some risk to myself, followed the cabling the length of the
airframe until I found one assembly at the tip of the tail fin, right next
to the spinning rotor, where the RF was being interrupted and reflected.
 
Taking it inside to the test bench, I discovered an internal capacitor lead
had crystallized and broken, and -- at just one engine setting -- the ends
of the break were vibrating enough to render radio transmissions
unintelligible.
 
I might take some pride in finding that when nobody else could -- but people
may have died because I was too tired, too lazy, or just not thinking well
enough to to try that earlier.
 
Died.
 
That's an ethics class no one should have to take. Three rubber grommets
could have prevented it, and I wonder how much was saved by leaving them
out...
 
How many wounded or dead (if any) I can't say.
 
I once shut down a manager complaining an AED's EMC Test Plan I'd been
contracted to write was too hard to pass and too expensive to meet. 
Never mind that the requirements had been increased, and all their own
engineers were busy bringing existing products up to the new standard; when
he asked why I'd made the test so hard I told him:
 
"I don't want you to kill people whose lives you're trying to save."
 
Ethics -- the hard way.
 
Cortland Richmond -- 26 December 2016
> 
-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website:      http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe)  <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules:     http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe)  <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe)  <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 
-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website:      http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe)  <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules:     http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com> 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to