I think Ken's rational makes sense to me, since the 51.5 is derived from 
20*log(377).  

Brent DeWitt, AB1LF
Milford, MA



-----Original Message-----
From: Macy [mailto:m...@basicisp.net] 
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 2:54 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] CORRECTION (wrong page) Passive Loop Emissions [General Use]

Accuracy within 1%, if measured outside the source loop by 3X, which is like 
'far field'

--- ken.ja...@emccompliance.com wrote:

From:         Ken Javor <ken.ja...@emccompliance.com>
To:           EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] CORRECTION (wrong page) Passive Loop Emissions [General Use]
Date:         Mon, 27 Feb 2017 13:36:12 -0600

It's valid in the absence of a magnetic material (relative permeability = 1).  
The 51.5 dB factor is based on the far field.

Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261



> From: John Woodgate <jmw1...@btinternet.com>
> Reply-To: John Woodgate <jmw1...@btinternet.com>
> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 18:07:27 -0000
> To: <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
> Subject: Re: [PSES] CORRECTION (wrong page) Passive Loop Emissions 
> [General Use]
> 
> I doubt that, because it's valid at audio frequencies, which 
> undoubtedly means 'near field'.
> 
> With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO   Own Opinions Only 
> www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England
> 
> Sylvae in aeternum manent.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cortland Richmond [mailto:k...@earthlink.net]
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 6:02 PM
> To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: Re: [PSES] CORRECTION (wrong page) Passive Loop Emissions 
> [General Use]
> 
> On 2/27/2017 12:23 PM, John Macaulay wrote:
>> The difference between dB(pT) and dB( A/m) is 2 dB.
>> 
>> dB(pT) -2 = dB( A/m)
> 
> This is
> 
> 
> true only in the Far Field.
> 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to