For many young today, the only significant digit is the middle finger, especially when they don't even want to know.
With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO – Own Opinions Only www.jmwa.demon.co.uk J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England Sylvae in aeternum manent. -----Original Message----- From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org] Sent: 01 August 2017 17:59 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Quasipeak definition Agree. However, the principles of "significant digits" is rarely understood by today's technical folks, and wasn't needed in the days of analog meters and slide rules where we usually got only two significant digits, and were lucky to get three significant digits. Rich > -----Original Message----- > From: Ralph McDiarmid > [mailto:Ralph.McDiarmid@SCHNEIDER- > ELECTRIC.COM] > Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 9:46 AM > To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG > Subject: Re: [PSES] Quasipeak definition > > Those topics used to be taught in engineer school. That should not be > on-the-job learning. > > Ralph McDiarmid > Product Compliance > Engineering > Solar Business > Schneider Electric > > > From: Brent DeWitt > [mailto:bdew...@ix.netcom.com] > Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 8:09 PM > To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG > Subject: Re: [PSES] Quasipeak definition > > The difference between resolution and accuracy is pretty intuitive to > those (old farts) who have lived through the transition from analog > meters and slide rules to digital meters and calculators. It is an > important differentiation to be passed on to folks who haven’t > thought about it. > > Brent DeWitt, AB1LF > Milford, MA > > From: Cortland Richmond [mailto:k...@earthlink.net] > Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 10:12 PM > To: mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG > Subject: Re: [PSES] Quasipeak definition > > https://www.amazon.com/Tekpower-TP188-Pocket- > size-Analog-Multimeter/dp/B00064CH6A > > Eh? > > I got some, old and recent, and I used them once to show folks it was > their 14-digit $XX,000, buss- controlled remote multimeter that had > them (planless and clueless) testing everything in sight for WEEKS. > > > Cortland -- WV6, KN4, W9,W1,DL4,DA1>>>KA5S > - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com> - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
