Hello. Imagine a Class B product and assume there are two suppliers of short range intentional radiator devices that are identical and use an identical reference design (one buys the device from the other and resells). Both have been evaluated using the modular approach for FCC and IC.
Assume also that there is negligible differences in emissions test result. For either device, the unit is marked to show the FCC ID and the IC ID. To allow these devices to be used interchangeably for one another without having to purchase new labels to support each device, is it acceptable to label either: 1) "May contain FCC ID: xxxx, IC ID: yyy or FCC ID: aaa, IC ID: bbb," or 2) "Contains FCC ID: xxxx, IC ID: yyy or FCC ID: aaa, IC ID: bbb" with a check box before each set of ID strings? Option 1 is preferred, since Option 2 requires a manual operation on an otherwise automated production line. Regards, Peter Tarver - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
