It isn't appropriate to refer to the ICNIRP publications. The correct reference (for Europe) is to EN 50527-1 and EN 50527-2-1. Unfortunately, these are not available free of charge. However, they are available at reasonable prices (in English) at https://www.evs.ee/shop.

John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK

On 2018-07-06 09:52, Dürrer Bernd wrote:
Hello Andy,

Thank you for pointing out the ICNIRP limits: Actually, I recently had a 
request concerning a service technician with a pacemaker and exposure to static 
magnetic fields when handling permanent magnet rotors.
However, when I check ICNIRP resources, I do not find any publication to 
justify higher limits. On the contrary, the “ICNIRP GUIDELINES ON LIMITS OF 
EXPOSURE TO STATIC MAGNETIC FIELDS” 
(https://www.icnirp.org/cms/upload/publications/ICNIRPstatgdl.pdf) contain the 
statement:

“Electromagnetic interference from low-intensity static magnetic fields has been 
observed to affect the operation of pacemakers, particularly those with magnetic 
switches, and other types of medical electronic devices, including cardiac 
defibrillators, hormone infusion pumps (e.g., for insulin), neuromuscular 
stimulation devices (e.g., for the sphincter muscle of the bladder), 
neurostimulators, and electronically operated prosthetic devices (e.g., for the 
limbs and inner ear). In general, the operation of these devices is not adversely 
affected by static magnetic fields below 0.5 mT."

The "ICNIRP GUIDELINES FOR LIMITING EXPOSURE TO TIME-VARYING ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC 
FIELDS (1 Hz TO 100 kHz)" 
(https://www.icnirp.org/cms/upload/publications/ICNIRPLFgdl.pdf) contain the following 
statement:

"Compliance with the present guidelines may not necessarily preclude interference 
with, or effects on, medical devices such as metallic prostheses, cardiac pacemakers and 
implanted defibrillators and cochlear implants. Interference with pacemakers may occur at 
levels below the recommended reference levels. Advice on avoiding these problems is 
beyond the scope of the present document but is available elsewhere (IEC 2005b)." 
(IEC2005b refers to IEC 60601-1-2)

Kind regards,

Bernd





-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to