The issue is with primary power: that supplied by the platform to electrical
and electronic loads. It does not apply to secondary power developed in a
load and supplied to another load. It has nothing to do with dc vs. ac. If a
load were supplied with 28 Vdc power from an aircraft platform and
subsequently converted that to say 24 Vac at 400 cycles to run some other
circuitry, the dc power would be subjected to the wording you cited, but the
ac power would not.

Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261




From: "James Pawson (U3C)" <ja...@unit3compliance.co.uk>
Reply-To: "James Pawson (U3C)" <ja...@unit3compliance.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 08:21:24 -0000
To: <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: [PSES] MIL-STD-461 and power cables sanity check

Hello all,
 
MIL-STD-461 has a requirement for any conductors in a cable assembly
carrying ³primary power² i.e. AC power from a vessel distribution bus to be
separated out from the main cable bunch and routed separately in a test
setup (clause 4.3.8.6). It also states that the primary power cables shall
not be shielded.
 
I understand the rationale for this, the explanatory notes at the end of the
standard are most helpful.
 
My interpretation is that:
 
1. this only applies to AC power buses (like those referenced in
MIL-STD-1399 
<http://everyspec.com/MIL-STD/MIL-STD-1300-1399/MIL-STD-1399-300B_13192/> )
and not to DC power supplied from another part of the EUT or from some
Associated Equipment
2. power supplied in this fashion can be supplied within a shielded cable if
that is what is specified in the final installation
 
Having not done any MIL-STD work before I just wanted to make sure my
interpretation was correct?
 
Many thanks as always,
James
 
 
James Pawson
Unit 3 Compliance
 
 
-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website:      http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules:     http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com>



-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to