I notice that IEC 62368 mentions tamper-proof screws in a couple places
(articles 0.8, 0.11), although not explicitly requiring them. It
describes tamper-proof screws as providing a supplemental safeguard
against hazards. I would take that to mean for level 3 hazards, for
example mains terminals, basic protection or other measures would ALSO
be needed such as covers using regular screws. What are the implications
for mains plugs assembled with slotted screws?
I have always assumed that requiring the use of a tool would provide
protection against access to level 3 hazards. Access to mains terminal
requirements seems to only require a tool per clause G.7.6.1. and V.1.1
The standard uses the term “tamper-proof screw” without definition. Is
it slotted, Phillips, Torx, security Torx, Allen, hex, Robertson, or
others <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_screw_drives> ?
Are there examples where ordinary fasteners must be replaced with
tamper-proof ones?
Bob Johnson
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <sdoug...@ieee.org>
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
