Charlie, et al,      If the requirements are tied to the physics then they 
should be reasonable.  

A couple of papers popped up in a google search.  Here’s one.  

 

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons 
Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the 
work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing LtdElectrostatics 2019 and 
Dielectrics 2019
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1322 (2019) 012010
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1322/1/012010
1
A kinetic model for the electrostatic spark discharge
in atmospheric-pressure air
A Ohsawa
Electrical Safety Research Group, National Institute of Occupational Safety and 
Health,
Japan (JNIOSH), 1-4-6 Umezono, Kiyose, Tokyo 204-0024, Japan
E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract. This paper presents a 0-D kinetic model of electrostatic spark 
discharges consisting
of the time-dependent Boltzmann equation of electrons, a discharge-circuit 
equation, and heavy
particles’ kinetic equations to investigate the energy-transfer mechanisms from 
the electrostatic
energy given to the energy of gases by the spark discharge. In this report, the 
model is applied
to the discharges in atmospheric-pressure air under optimum conditions 
corresponding for the
minimum ignition energies of the typical flammable gases, hydrogen, ethylene 
and propane, in
three types of explosion groups for gases.

 

               Altho the article focuses on flammable gases it discusses it 
relative to air which is the basis for ESD arcs of interest in other 
situations.  

 

:>)     br,      Pete

 

Peter E Perkins, PE

Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant

PO Box 1067

Albany, ORe  97321-0413

 

503/452-1201

 

IEEE Life Fellow

IEEE PSES 2020 Distinguished Lecturer

 <http://www.researchgate.net/Peter%20Perkins> www.researchgate.net search my 
name

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 

 

Entropy ain’t what it used to be

 

From: Charlie Blackham <[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 9:50 AM
To: Pete Perkins <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [PSES] Climatic conditions for ESD testing

 

EN 61000-4-2 specifies a minimum air pressure of 860 mbar but, 

*       920 mbar is the centre of a cat 5 hurricane at sea level
*       860 mbar is about 4500m above sea level

 

Hardly the most rigorous set of criteria ever written into a standard 😊

 

Best regards

Charlie

 

Charlie Blackham

Sulis Consultants Ltd

Tel: +44 (0)7946 624317

Web:  <https://sulisconsultants.com/> https://sulisconsultants.com/ 

Registered in England and Wales, number 05466247

 

From: Pete Perkins <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > 
Sent: 29 July 2021 17:32
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: [PSES] Climatic conditions for ESD testing

 

John,     You need to address your question to the committee that is 
responsible for the standard you are questioning.  

 

               Remember that the standards writing business is a BOGSAT process 
(Bunch Of Guys Sitting Around a Table).  Most of the participants are there 
because they know something about the subject (subject expert matter delegates) 
or they have some issue that they either want addressed or want to have it 
excluded from the standard (latter is usually not disclosed until deep into the 
discussion).  If the leader can come up with a comprehensive outline as to the 
subjects to be addressed then the process will be more comprehensive; if not it 
will be less organized.  

               Specifically for this case; why did the committee write another 
standard that seems to cover the same ground as a base standard IEC 61000-4-2?  
Wot’s the rationale for this additional standard?  

 

               Standards writing is not a scientific endeavor (even tho it uses 
scientific principles, such as you pointed out); It’s like sausage making – but 
don’t go into the kitchen if you aren’t ready to be involved in making the 
sausage…    

               If you have strong feelings about the completeness of the 
product level standard perhaps you should be on the committee and straighten it 
out.  Don’t just grumble, get involved.  

 

:>)     br,      Pete

 

Peter E Perkins, PE

Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant

PO Box 1067

Albany, ORe  97321-0413

 

503/452-1201

 

IEEE Life Fellow

IEEE PSES 2020 Distinguished Lecturer

www.researchgate.net <http://www.researchgate.net/Peter%20Perkins>  search my 
name

[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 

 

 

Entropy ain’t what it used to be

 

From: John Flavin <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 5:39 AM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: [PSES] Climatic conditions for ESD testing

 

IEC 61000-4-2 specifies climatic conditions for air discharge, including 
barometric pressure. ISO 10605 (ESD for road vehicles) is silent about 
barometric pressure.

As I remember, air pressure influences the reproducibility of air discharges, 
which I assume is why IEC 61000-4-2 specifies limit on it. (ISO 10605:2008 even 
says this in Annex E.)

 

So, if it’s important, why is this not specified in ISO 10605?

 

 




John Flavin

Senior EMC Engineer

1860 Vermeer Road East | Pella, IA USA 50219

O: 641-621-8958

[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 

 
<http://www.vermeer.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=emailsignature&utm_campaign=mysignature.vermeer.mobi>
 vermeer.com

 

 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) 
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) 
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to