John,     Thanx for your response.  If true: 

 

               It's foolish at best and irresponsible in the worst case to
demand control when all the technical expertise lies within the IEC on this
subject, not the ISO.  

 

               Politics at its worst in action (we see such all the time,
unfortunately).  

 

:>)     br,      Pete

 

Peter E Perkins, PE

Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant

PO Box 1067

Albany, ORe  97321-0413

 

503/452-1201

 

IEEE Life Fellow

IEEE PSES 2020 Distinguished Lecturer

 <http://www.researchgate.net/Peter%20Perkins> www.researchgate.net search
my name

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 

 

Entropy ain't what it used to be

 

From: John Woodgate <[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 10:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] Climatic conditions for ESD testing

 

They did it because the motor industry wants to have all its standards in
ISO (obviously they have thousands of mechanical standards), not IEC, and
wants full control over them.

============================================================================
==========
Best wishes John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
www.woodjohn.uk <http://www.woodjohn.uk> 
Rayleigh, Essex UK
Istae nunc praetereunt nisi non ubicumque




On 2021-07-29 17:32, Pete Perkins wrote:

Specifically for this case; why did the committee write another standard
that seems to cover the same ground as a base standard IEC 61000-4-2?  Wot's
the rationale for this additional standard?  

 

  _____  


 <https://www.avg.com/internet-security> 

This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. 
www.avg.com <https://www.avg.com/internet-security>  





-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
well-used formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html> 
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 


-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to