My apologies to everyone - I did not intend to drift into a political
discussion!  My question was meant to be focused on the product safety /
regulatory concerns that arose after Brexit (that is, ones that did not
previously exist), NOT whether sovereignty is good or bad in any other way.

>From just that single-minded perspective I found in my own job that Brexit
created more work without adding an iota of value to the product.  Also
from that selfish point-of-view I would hate to see the other countries in
the EU decide to seize national sovereignty and implement their own
regulations, their own markings and their own paperwork.
  😖
In other words from the narrow product safety / regulatory position (which
is how I was looking at it), "encouraging [the UK] to exit from the EU" did
the OPPOSITE of the "removal of unnecessary trade barriers".  It may or may
not have had other beneficial results - a political argument for which this
is NOT the forum - but for me it just meant more paperwork that previously
had not existed.

Along the same lines in the US - the National Electric Code (NEC) is a
guide for the thousands of Authorities Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) within the
country - in other words "sovereignty" within their city / county / state -
to decide what applies to their bailiwick.  Does this make life easier for
those trying to build or install a product if the standards vary across the
country?  Certainly not!

Which of course is one reason why UL / Intertek / CSA / other NRTLs have
been successful.  But that is another discussion.

Best regards,
John McBain


On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 11:18 AM Lfresearch <lfresea...@aol.com> wrote:

> Easy John, but first address my key issue with the EU: surrender of
> sovereignty. Period.
>
> Second, EU is not the only trading market, something missed by members of
> the community. It’s a fact the CE mark adds way more cost than the return
> on investment of performance improvement. Not having to do this simplifies
> the route to market compliance and hence makes the product cheaper.
>
> I could go on, but I have to teach today, I’d be happy to resume the
> discussion later.
>
> BUT, reemphasize my first point: surrender of sovereignty. Period.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Derek.
>
>
> On Nov 7, 2022, at 1:04 PM, John Mcbain <johnmcb...@ieee.org> wrote:
>
> Hello Lfresearch -
>
> Would you please explain to me how you reconcile "removal of unnecessary
> trade barriers" and "encouraging for England [*note: actually UK*] to
> exit from the EU"?
> Those views seem to be mutually incompatible, since Brexit has raised new
> non-tariff trade barriers (additional certifications, markings, etc.).
>
> Best regards,
> John McBain
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 10:14 AM Lfresearch <
> 000000734758d943-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org> wrote:
>
>> I think most people have learned to not listen to MSM, but rely on
>> individuals in groups like this to further knowledge. It’s highly
>> beneficial to have working members, most without a dog in the fight, in
>> multiple economic zones.
>>
>> That said, and to counterpoint a different position, I was originally in
>> favor of England joining the EU many years ago since the idea of removing
>> barriers to free trade is highly appealing.
>>
>> HOWEVER, what has transpired while populations have been asleep at the
>> wheel is nothing other than a power grab of sovereignty: Totally
>> unacceptable and it was highly encouraging for England to exit from the EU
>> and I hope other will follow. I have a hope that the UK and the rest of the
>> world can work toward the removal of unnecessary trade barriers and
>> standardization. Something I devote many hours a day promoting.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Derek.
>>
>> On Nov 7, 2022, at 11:45 AM, Doug Powell <doug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks John,
>>
>> As you can imagine mainstream media tends to give us a filtered view,
>> with various unspoken motivations.  This is the very reason I do not rely
>> upon a single source.  And of course, guidance provided on
>> https://www.gov.uk should always be viewed in its official capacity.
>>
>> I appreciate your insider's perspective,  -Doug
>>
>>
>> Douglas E Powell
>> Laporte, Colorado USA
>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/coloradocomplianceguy/>
>>
>> (UTC -06:00) Mountain Time (US-MDT)
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 9:58 AM <john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Doug & co
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I can only speak for myself and what I have seen & heard in the
>>> mainstream broadcast media (don’t do Twitter, FB etc!).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The majority viewpoint seems to be that it is far too late to do
>>> anything in the short-medium term about re-joining the EU, even if there
>>> was another referendum on the subject that said “Yes, Rejoin”. None of the
>>> main-stream political parties are pushing for it *(at least those in
>>> England, but there are very different views held by some parties in Wales,
>>> N. Ireland and especially the SNP in Scotland!).*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thus I can’t see it happening “anytime soon”, if at all!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> FWIW: To state my personal perspective, I was very much in favour of the
>>> UK joining in the first place many years ago because of my experiences of
>>> the many “technical barriers to trade” which made exporting to the then
>>> (IIRC!) Common Market countries really difficult due to all the differences
>>> between them. Then, in the Referendum I was very much in favour of
>>> Remaining in the EC & very disappointed in the (marginal!) result *(my
>>> opinion of those who voted to leave was/still is fairly unprintable –
>>> something about “cutting off your nose to spite your face”!)*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> John E Allen
>>>
>>> W. London, UK
>>>
>>> *From:* Doug Powell <doug...@gmail.com>
>>> *Sent:* 07 November 2022 16:15
>>> *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>>> *Subject:* Re: [PSES] FW: Intertek message FYI: Important Update:
>>> Pending Regulatory Change to UKCA Program
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I've been watching the latest UK news with interest.  From
>>> my perspective in the US news media, it seems with the financial, energy,
>>> and PM woes, there is a small movement discussing how BREXIT may have been
>>> a mistake.  Possibly John Allen can elaborate about how the locals feel
>>> about this, Is there any real possibility of reverting to EU membership, or
>>> not?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> thanks,  -Doug
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Douglas E Powell
>>>
>>> Laporte, Colorado USA
>>>
>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/coloradocomplianceguy/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> (UTC -06:00) Mountain Time (US-MDT)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 8:53 AM Richard Georgerian <
>>> richa...@mesanetworks.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Greetings all,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> As a follow-up to John Allen’s email below –
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Has the UK submitted and/or passed any legislation for the UKCA
>>> labelling easement until December 31, 2025? Otherwise, the UKCA labelling
>>> starts on December 31, 2022.
>>>
>>> I went to the www.gov.uk website and there is no mention of the
>>> specific legislation. Just the announcement that the UK *intends to
>>> submit* legislation for the easement.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank-you,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> …Richard Georgerian
>>>
>>> Compliance Engineer
>>>
>>> HID Global
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* John E Allen <000009cc677f395b-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org>
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 4, 2022 9:01 AM
>>> *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>>> *Subject:* [PSES] FW: Intertek message FYI: Important Update: Pending
>>> Regulatory Change to UKCA Program
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> For anyone who has not seen this or something similar!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> John E Allen
>>>
>>> W.London, UK
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Intertek <nore...@e.intertek.com>
>>> *Sent:* 03 August 2022 12:58
>>> *To:* john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk
>>> *Subject:* Important Update: Pending Regulatory Change to UKCA Program
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The UK Government has announced its intention to introduce new
>>> regulation as a principle
>>> ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [image: Intertek]
>>> <http://links.intertek.mkt4245.com/els/v2/pwaLHKk2DmCr/WFpETTVWYjJqaDhRL3kwZmJzejB4VE05NlQwVlBlNUtvRGx0dDVOaWNGZ0RZYmtrdCtybytMRVJxb0UwWVhzRnBkaWZROWJwcnJiU1BjTWdxc0J4MDduTUxhQWx0R1k2d2c1TTNWR2ZSMFE9S0/b3grNmY2R3BIM2RhZ1VheDBwYlVydUt2VjRQV3piYUtiOHgvbTNvSGIyd3g0eVQrVEVMbEtJWElxS0V0U2lZNjZveVQzQTFUSjF3YjZnaWhyNDNLR2E5b0dZUFduUFgvZGhlQVZBLzM1YncxYVY1TE8zcU5EVitsbnRmMGNBMDBEUENMaE9QTmVudmhvM1Q1MXJrcmZQZkR1MkZtRXo2bU1wVVgrWTlIVFY0PQS2>
>>>
>>> [image: Total Quality. Assured.]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *The UK is pending a regulatory change to their UKCA Program*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The UK Government has announced its intention to introduce new
>>> regulation as a principle so to reduce the costs involved for the
>>> re-certification/re-testing of products for UKCA marking. This new
>>> regulation, when introduced (no timelines given), and based on the summary
>>> notice criteria, will effectively increase the acceptance of CE marking of
>>> products as a means of meeting UKCA marking requirements.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Until this new regulation is introduced, the current framework,
>>> timelines and conformity assessment process for UKCA marking remains, in
>>> that from 01 January 2023, CE marking will no longer be accepted when
>>> placing product onto the Great Britain Market.*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The full details of the UK Government announcement can be found here
>>> <http://links.intertek.mkt4245.com/els/v2/K6~VJWdr~zQZ/WFpETTVWYjJqaDhRL3kwZmJzejB4VE05NlQwVlBlNUtvRGx0dDVOaWNGZ0RZYmtrdCtybytMRVJxb0UwWVhzRnBkaWZROWJwcnJiU1BjTWdxc0J4MDduTUxhQWx0R1k2d2c1TTNWR2ZSMFE9S0/>.
>>> Please refer to the 22 June update.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *READ THE UPDATE*
>>> <http://links.intertek.mkt4245.com/els/v2/_k~8BzWqA_QR/WFpETTVWYjJqaDhRL3kwZmJzejB4VE05NlQwVlBlNUtvRGx0dDVOaWNGZ0RZYmtrdCtybytMRVJxb0UwWVhzRnBkaWZROWJwcnJiU1BjTWdxc0J4MDduTUxhQWx0R1k2d2c1TTNWR2ZSMFE9S0/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *On Introduction of The New Regulation*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> In summary, product conformity assessment will see the following
>>> changes:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    - Completed conformity assessment activities carried out on product
>>>    under EU requirements (including existing testing, certification, and
>>>    contractual arrangements relating to the quality control or auditing of
>>>    existing certificates) undertaken by non-UK conformity assessment bodies
>>>    (EU Notified Bodies accredited by their national accreditation body) for 
>>> CE
>>>    certification before 1 January 2023 to be used by manufacturers to 
>>> declare
>>>    existing product types as compliant with UKCA.
>>>    - Products must still bear UKCA marking and will need to undergo
>>>    conformity assessment with a UK Approved Body at the expiry of the
>>>    certificate or after 5 years (31 December 2027), whichever is sooner.
>>>    - Manufacturers to apply the UKCA mark without the need for any
>>>    UK-recognised CAB involvement and continue to place their goods on the
>>>    market, on the basis of their existing CE type examination completed 
>>> before
>>>    31 December 2022, for the lifetime of the certificate issued, or until 31
>>>    December 2027 (whichever is sooner).
>>>    - Conformity assessment procedures not completed and supported by a
>>>    CE certificate issued before 1 January 2023, these products are 
>>> considered
>>>    ‘new’ products. This also includes where goods are subject to important
>>>    changes, overhauling its original performance, purpose, or type requiring
>>>    new certification. Any ‘new’ good must comply with GB regulatory
>>>    requirements, including the requirement for conformity assessment by a UK
>>>    approved body from 1 January 2023.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The new legislation when introduced concerning UKCA marking effect only
>>> the following UK Regulations:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    - Noise Emission in the Environment by Equipment for Outdoor Use
>>>    Regulations 2001
>>>    - Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regulations 2008
>>>    Ecodesign for Energy-Related Products Regulations 2010
>>>    - Toys (Safety) Regulations 2011
>>>    - Explosives Regulations 2014
>>>    - Pyrotechnic Articles (Safety) Regulations 2015
>>>    - Electromagnetic Compatibility Regulations 2016
>>>    - Simple Pressure Vessels (Safety) Regulations 2016
>>>    - Lifts Regulations 2016
>>>    - Pressure Equipment (Safety) Regulations 2016
>>>    - Equipment and Protective Systems Intended for Use in Potentially
>>>    Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2016
>>>    - Non-automatic Weighing Instruments Regulations 2016
>>>    - Measuring Instruments Regulations 2016
>>>    - Recreational Craft Regulations 2017
>>>    - Radio Equipment Regulations 2017
>>>    - Regulation 2016/425 on personal protective equipment as it applies
>>>    in GB
>>>    - Regulation 2016/426 on gas appliances as it applies in GB
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [image: Globe Icon]
>>>
>>> *Our Address*
>>>
>>> Intertek
>>> Day Ave
>>> Knowlhill
>>> Milton Keynes
>>> MK5 8NL
>>>
>>> [image: img]
>>>
>>> *Urgent Testing Need?*
>>>
>>> Contact us today at:
>>> *AMER: *+1 800 WORLDLAB or +1 251 459 6173
>>> *EMEA: *+44 116 296 1620
>>> *APAC: *+852 2173 8888
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> intertek.com
>>> <http://links.intertek.mkt4245.com/els/v2/DA3KfDPEaqQb/WFpETTVWYjJqaDhRL3kwZmJzejB4VE05NlQwVlBlNUtvRGx0dDVOaWNGZ0RZYmtrdCtybytMRVJxb0UwWVhzRnBkaWZROWJwcnJiU1BjTWdxc0J4MDduTUxhQWx0R1k2d2c1TTNWR2ZSMFE9S0/b3grNmY2R3BIM2RhZ1VheDBwYlVydUt2VjRQV3piYUtiOHgvbTNvSGIyd3g0eVQrVEVMbEtJWElxS0V0U2lZNjZveVQzQTFUSjF3YjZnaWhyNDNLR2E5b0dZUFduUFgvZGhlQVZBLzM1YncxYVY1TE8zcU5EVitsbnRmMGNBMDBEUENMaE9QTmVudmhvM1Q1MXJrcmZQZkR1MkZtRXo2bU1wVVgrWTlIVFY0PQS2>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Privacy Policy
>>> <http://links.intertek.mkt4245.com/els/v2/3Yz6H9aXD7Sg/WFpETTVWYjJqaDhRL3kwZmJzejB4VE05NlQwVlBlNUtvRGx0dDVOaWNGZ0RZYmtrdCtybytMRVJxb0UwWVhzRnBkaWZROWJwcnJiU1BjTWdxc0J4MDduTUxhQWx0R1k2d2c1TTNWR2ZSMFE9S0/b3grNmY2R3BIM2RhZ1VheDBwYlVydUt2VjRQV3piYUtiOHgvbTNvSGIyd3g0eVQrVEVMbEtJWElxS0V0U2lZNjZveVQzQTFUSjF3YjZnaWhyNDNLR2E5b0dZUFduUFgvZGhlQVZBLzM1YncxYVY1TE8zcU5EVitsbnRmMGNBMDBEUENMaE9QTmVudmhvM1Q1MXJrcmZQZkR1MkZtRXo2bU1wVVgrWTlIVFY0PQS2>
>>>   |   Opt out of all communications
>>> <https://e1.intertek.com/ic-optout/default?spMailingID=27103363&spUserID=MTkxNDM3Mjc5NTQwS0&spJobID=MjI0NDUzOTA1MQS2&spReportId=MjI0NDUzOTA1MQS2>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *This email was sent to john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk
>>> <john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk>.*
>>>
>>>
>>> <http://links.intertek.mkt4245.com/els/v2/89g4FVm4_ZtY/WFpETTVWYjJqaDhRL3kwZmJzejB4VE05NlQwVlBlNUtvRGx0dDVOaWNGZ0RZYmtrdCtybytMRVJxb0UwWVhzRnBkaWZROWJwcnJiU1BjTWdxc0J4MDduTUxhQWx0R1k2d2c1TTNWR2ZSMFE9S0/b3grNmY2R3BIM2RhZ1VheDBwYlVydUt2VjRQV3piYUtiOHgvbTNvSGIyd3g0eVQrVEVMbEtJWElxS0V0U2lZNjZveVQzQTFUSjF3YjZnaWhyNDNLR2E5b0dZUFduUFgvZGhlQVZBLzM1YncxYVY1TE8zcU5EVitsbnRmMGNBMDBEUENMaE9QTmVudmhvM1Q1MXJrcmZQZkR1MkZtRXo2bU1wVVgrWTlIVFY0PQS2>
>>>
>>> -
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
>>> emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail
>>> to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
>>>
>>> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>>> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
>>>
>>> Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>>> Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
>>> unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
>>> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>>>
>>> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>>> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
>>>
>>> For policy questions, send mail to:
>>> Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
>>> David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
>>> https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
>>>
>>> -
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
>>> emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail
>>> to &LT;emc-p...@ieee.org&GT;
>>>
>>> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>>> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
>>>
>>> Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>>> Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
>>> unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
>>> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>>>
>>> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>>> Mike Cantwell &LT;mcantw...@ieee.org&GT;
>>>
>>> For policy questions, send mail to:
>>> Jim Bacher &LT;j.bac...@ieee.org&GT;
>>> David Heald &LT;dhe...@gmail.com&GT;
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
>>> https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
>>>
>>> -
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
>>> emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail
>>> to <emc-p...@ieee.org>
>>>
>>> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>>> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
>>>
>>> Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>>> Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
>>> unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
>>> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>>>
>>> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>>> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
>>>
>>> For policy questions, send mail to:
>>> Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
>>> David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
>>> https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
>>>
>> -
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
>> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <
>> emc-p...@ieee.org>
>>
>> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
>>
>> Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>> Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
>> unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
>> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>>
>> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>
>>
>> For policy questions, send mail to:
>> Jim Bacher <j.bac...@ieee.org>
>> David Heald <dhe...@gmail.com>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
>>
>>
>> -
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
>> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to &LT;
>> emc-p...@ieee.org&GT;
>>
>> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
>>
>> Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>> Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
>> unsubscribe) <http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
>> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>>
>> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>> Mike Cantwell &LT;mcantw...@ieee.org&GT;
>>
>> For policy questions, send mail to:
>> Jim Bacher &LT;j.bac...@ieee.org&GT;
>> David Heald &LT;dhe...@gmail.com&GT;
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1
>>
>
>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

Reply via email to