I lied 8000 steps per inch

(8000*120)/60 = 16000

where does that put me for a period?

Andy




John Kasunich wrote:
> Andy Holcomb wrote:
>   
>> John Kasunich wrote:
>>     
>>> Andy Holcomb wrote:
>>>       
>>>> John Kasunich wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> Andy Holcomb wrote:
>>>>>           
>>>>>> On EMC1, I was running Axis speeds of more than 120ipm, I can't get EMC 
>>>>>> 2 past around 60. I am running a 1.6 ghz computer.  
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Steppers or servos?
>>>>>           
>>>> Steppers
>>>>         
>>>>> What step frequency does your machine need to get 120ipm?
>>>>>           
>>> You didn't answer this one.
>>>       
>> 4000 steps per inch
>> (120 * 4000)/60  = 8000 ?
>>     
>
> 120 ipm should be a piece of cake then.  If you only need 8000 steps
> per second, you can make BASE_PERIOD something like 30000 and still
> have plenty of headroom.  The larger period will reduce the load on
> your PC, and give you more timing margin to allow for latency.
>
> Regards,
>
> John Kasunich
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
>   

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to