Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
> Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> 
> 
>>Jon Elson,
>>   Your documentation shows the last output is hardwired to the estop
>>chain. We are using four I/O cards on the G&L. Is there a way to
>>change that so all four #7 outputs are not used in this manner? We
>>would like to use them for other things.
>>thanks
>>Stuart
>> 
>>
> 
> I think I can answer this for Jon.
> 
> No.  :)
> 
> The FPGA uses that input to disable PWM/step output, and reset all SSRs 
> off.  This is independent of whether EMC2 notices the problem, as it 
> should be for ESTOP.  I'm not sure how this will work for you regarding 
> the estop reset.  I think you need to set SSR8 on to get the FPGA to try 
> to start up again, so you'd need to hook all four of them to the same 
> HAL signal I think.  You'd probably want a similar thing for the estop 
> inputs - you'd AND or OR them together to get a single combined ESTOP input.
What you say is true for the USC and UPC boards, but the PPMC 
has some more flexibility to it.  It has master and slave DIO 
boards, for instance, and while the UPC/USC has SSR 8 hardwired 
to the estop FF, all 8 SSRs are completely under software 
control on the PPMC's DIO board.  So, the E-stop chain and 
e-stop FF on the master board controls all DIO boards (and 
DAC's, too) in the system.  All 8 SSRs on each DIO board are 
completely under software control except when in E-stop, when 
they are all forced off by the master DIO.

I gather that the hal_ppmc.c driver logic is overriding SSR8 on 
all boards, it should only do that on the master board.

Jon

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to