On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 11:45 -0500, Kenneth Lerman wrote:
> I took a quick look at your code...
>
> case 3:
> dacclock=0;
> if (cycle>=12) {
> cycle=0;
> }
> phase=0;
> cycle++;
> break;
> Should be:
> case 3:
> dacclock=0;
> if (cycle>=11) {
> cycle=0;
> } else cycle++;
> phase=0;
> break;
Thanks Ken. Now that I see it, my mistake is fairly obvious. I'll talk
to Santa to see if I can get you back on the Nice list.
I fixed the 8-bit only shift problem in my new version which "cycles"
the data down from bit 11, instead of the mask up to bit 11. I made the
same reset/increment mistake on the new version, so the .comp file is
now even better. I sure wish I had the parts in hand -- maybe by the end
of the week.
--
Kirk Wallace (California, USA
http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/
Hardinge HNC lathe,
Bridgeport mill conversion, doing XY now,
Zubal lathe conversion pending)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
