Thanks Anders Wallin wrote: >> So are is there any of these that follow Rs274? >> > > more or less all of the ones below follow 'standard' g-code to some > extent I would think :) > > To really verify what works and what doesn't on each machine is beyond > what most people and companies have time/money to do. There is not much > convergence towards a common standard. The CAM software vendors are > happy to charge extra for a myriad of different post-processors and > their annual subscriptions... > It's strange that the machining industry hasn't settled on a standard > language for toolpaths. Julian Todd has much more to say about this - > see for example half way through this post: > http://www.freesteel.co.uk/wpblog/2008/01/worknc-art-and-mori-seiki/ > > > AW > > >> 426_Parm_3d >> DIN_ISO >> Fadel_3d >> Fanuc >> Fanuc3d >> Fanuc3x >> Fanuc4ax >> Haas_3x >> Maho432_3d >> Mikron23 >> Okuma_3d >> Roeders >> Roeders4 >> Sin810_4_3d >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
