On 21 Oct 2008 at 6:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Jon,
>   Thanks for the information on the G code.  If you have been "reading
>   the mail" you know I
> am just jetting started in LINUX / EMC2. So stand by for some read new
> guy dumb questions.

Everyone was/is a newbee at one time that's why we try and get you over the 
hump 
as most of us remember the climb up we took...

>    I was in AXIS, MDI mode playing with the G Code.  I set the inch
>    measurement first and only once (G20)  and then moved on the Y axis
>    using G1 Y+1.959F4, and that worked great.
> I them moved on the x axis  with G1 X+.120F4 and that worked great.
> But the next movement did not work out. I entered G1 Y-1.959F4. The
> tool moved in the right direction ok, but did not stop where it was
> supposed to. It kept on going. I  had to ESTOP the machine.  So where
> was my mistake?

My guess is your mistake was thinking that it would move the opposite direction 
1.959 but what you got was a move "to" -1.959 which is a distance of 3.190 from 
1.959. 

Once you set a feed rate you don't have to set it again until you want change 
it. The 
same is true for G1. Also the + is not needed. 

For example you could do it like this:

G1 Y1.959 F4 G20
X0.120 (G1 is still in force)
Y0 ( the move back to where you started)

What you learned was the difference between absolute and incremental modes.

http://www.linuxcnc.org/docview/html//gcode_main.html#sub:G90,-G91:-Set

Otherwise you have the scaling wrong on the Y axis...

John

> 
> John


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to