Rob Jansen wrote: > But ... after reading your previous mail and re-thinking about the > FERROR and MIN_FERROR I have seen the light. > The 0.025 mm/rev system had 0.000012 mm/count on the encoder but with > 2.5 mm/rev this now is 0.0012 mm/count. But a MIN_FERROR of 0.001 is > then of course smaller than the resolution of the encoder. > In order to have the same system as before I need to multiply both error > values by 100.
Ah, that makes sense! Glad you figured it out :-) -- Sebastian Kuzminsky ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
