Dave pisze: > On 5/12/2010 4:16 PM, Michał Geszkiewicz wrote: > >> Andy Pugh pisze: >> >> >>> On 12 May 2010 19:19, Slavko Kocjancic<esla...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> I still prefer to have complete program (or split part) inside travel's. >>>> Just in case if somebody ring in the door and that take little more time >>>> that I think. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Well, perhaps the "Run Anyway?" should be followed by "Are you really >>> sure? you do realise that you won't be able to answer the door" >>> >>> If we are going to have "Run anyway", then it should. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Problem is that emc has 1000 lines readahead buffer so it will preload >> and check against limits every preload line. >> We will fix it, but for now if you all want to run it even if some line >> in program is out of limit you must (only in 2.4.0 and further) >> add line >> [TASK] INTERP_MAX_LEN = 2 >> >> that will decrease buffer to 2 lines only. >> >> regards, >> Michael >> >> >> >> > > Michael, > > Won't shortening the look ahead buffer affect blending? > > I have no problem with it either way .... I just saw it as an > inconsistency. > > Dave (Dave911 on IRC) > > Readahead is written in user code, totally independent of blending that is in real time code.
regards, Michael > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
