On Sat, 29 May 2010, cogoman wrote:

> Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 09:48:34 -0400
> From: cogoman <cogo...@verizon.net>
> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>     <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Emc-users] reducing jitter at low speeds
> 
> I read this article in Machine Design a while back and thought it was
> very interesting.  It was reprinted in their 2010 product locator, and I
> thought y'all would appreciate it.  I also thought that if there were no
> patent issues, this might find it's way into EMC2.
>
> http://machinedesign.com/article/new-algorithm-thwarts-velocity-disturbances-in-motion-control-schemes-0721
>
>


This looks to be exactly how tracking resolver interfaces work:

a second order control loop where the input error (acceleration) is bounded
to some settable value.
(ideally applied_torque +- maximum disturb_torque if these are known)

Probably pretty east to try with a simple double integrator HAL component 
(like  PI loop)

You can also look at this as a PLL that has the normal PLL feature  of 
filtering out phase jitter while still tracking the input frequency.



>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

Peter Wallace
Mesa Electronics

(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to