On 08/11/2011 07:55 AM, andy pugh wrote: > On 11 August 2011 12:20, Mark Wendt<[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Something appears to be missing in that formula above. Solving for >> torque, we have 3000 rpm * Pi/400 and we end up with a figure of 23.56 >> Nm. Translating rpms into rotations per second, we end up with 1413.675 >> Nm. >> > 3000 rpm = 50rps = 314 rad/sec. > 400W / 314 rad/sec = 1.274Nm. Which matches the continuous-rated spec. >
Ooops, I goofed that one, didn't I? ;-) Thanks for pointing out my math error Andy. Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
