On 8 September 2011 02:03, Ben Jackson <b...@ben.com> wrote: > Are functions like comp and lut5 evaluated in the order of 'addf' or > are there other factors (like device-num)?
They are run in the order they are added by default. However, you can force a function into a position if you want. The docs don't mention it in all the places that they might, but the hal_add_funct_to_threa manpage contains the following: 20 .IP \fIposition\fR 21 The desired location within the thread. This determines when the function will 22 run, in relation to other functions in the thread. A positive number indicates 23 the desired location as measured from the beginning of the thread, and a 24 negative is measured from the end. So +1 means this function will become the 25 first one to run, +5 means it will be the fifth one to run, -2 means it will be 26 next to last, and -1 means it will be last. Zero is illegal. So, if you want the function you add to run last: add function base-thread -1 -- atp "Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
