On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 20:56 -0600, Jon Elson wrote: > Kent A. Reed wrote: > > Well, I certainly never heard of this until now, and I spent a fair > > amount of time reading the docs when you were first talking about the > > Beagle Board. Now I don't feel so bad that some time ago I got tired of > > waiting on results from Torsten and decided to build the BB I bought > > into a pedestrian, non-real time project. > > > 240 ns is not a killer! That is still faster than the PC parallel port, > if it is used right. > But, it sure slows down what the OMAP COULD be capable of doing. > > Jon
I wonder if another processor would be better? The System-on-chip processors seem to have the same problems as common PC processors in that they incorporate features to cater to media and Internet applications. Maybe a server or DSP processor would be better? -- Kirk Wallace http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/ http://www.wallacecompany.com/E45/index.html California, USA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
