On Jan 29, 2012 12:44 PM, "Kirk Wallace" <kwall...@wallacecompany.com> wrote: > > Regarding messing with the g-code interpreter, my vote is that g-code > should describe axis position, feedrate; and spindle speed and > direction, and little more. Everything else should be handled with CAM, > including canned cycles and such. Less is more. >
I would agree if there were an open source CAM that was good. I tried pycam but it is lacking. Given that I can't afford an expensive package I find it pretty easy to just write gcode. Especially for simple things. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
