Erik Christiansen wrote: > Um ... that's always been my problem, when reading the older > documentation. i.e. "where the machine is NOW" w.r.t. what? Yes, touch > off from the workpiece, and those other references become moot. > > It scares me that coordinate offsets could be cumulative. Coordinate > offsets (workspaces) should not nest, I believe. I have not read > anything in the doco to say that they do. > Umm, I think a long time ago, back before EMC2, they could be considered cumulative, as offsets were added to current position. But, I think that was changed maybe even before the move to EMC2. But, I have stayed away from G10 L2 and G92 due to all sorts of weird problems I had with these years ago. Using Axis and touch off, I have not had any unexpected behavior when making parts, and that's what matters!
Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
