one more..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7skJhKzU7Y

Dad is having too much fun...

sam

On 07/11/2013 08:43 PM, sam sokolik wrote:
> quick threading video..  (yes - not the correct cutter - and the exit
> move is a bit shallow..  but shows the spindle sync is right on...)
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERMizV-yy8U
>
> sam
>
> On 07/11/2013 02:56 PM, sam sokolik wrote:
>> Seems to run nice at 40ipm
>>
>> http://electronicsam.com/images/emco/EMCOThreading.JPG
>>
>> video soon...
>>
>>
>> On 7/9/2013 11:34 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
>>> ok - some cool news I think.  So - with the switch on the interface
>>> board set to off (non step/dir mode)  the control signals are 4 phase
>>> drive.  (seems to be unipolar).  pins 2 through 5 control one axis - 6
>>> through 9 control the other.  I hacked a hal file to setup stepgen to
>>> output 4 phase (patterns 5 through 10).
>>>
>>> First tried pattern 9 (Unipolar Half Step) because the scale was setup
>>> for that.
>>> the performance was the same.  20ipm max and would probably have to back
>>> that off...
>>>
>>> Second was pattern 10 (Bipolar Half Step)  I know - not likely - and it
>>> wasn't.  Didn't like it.
>>>
>>> Third was pattern 5 (Unipolar Full Step)  I halved the axis scales also.
>>> similar performance..  20ipm max.  (and sound so far was pretty crappy)
>>>
>>> fourth was pattern 6 (Unipolar Full Step (two windings on))
>>> Holy crap.  That sounds nice.  maxed out at 30ipm and didn't try any
>>> faster.  Full stepping is .00054ish per step.  Workable for sure.
>>>
>>> That is what the original control/software maxed out at.  I will try
>>> faster when I get a chance.
>>>
>>> That is totally usable with linuxcnc - no mods to the control.  I need
>>> to hook up the index and 100ppr and try some threading!
>>>
>>> One thing to try is - I think I can put the interface board back into
>>> step/dir and full step.  I don't know what pattern it does though.
>>>
>>> sam (happy dancing..)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/8/2013 7:13 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
>>>> We got a few of these lathes from a local school.  they are cute little
>>>> cnc lathes.
>>>> The technology is pretty old though. The steppers are 72 steps per rev.
>>>>
>>>> I found this
>>>> http://www.maxton.com/ebay/emco/EMCO%20Compact%205PC%20Conversion%20to%20Mach3.pdf
>>>>
>>>> which talks about converting to mach.  They remove the octal latch and
>>>> jump through it.
>>>> I wanted to see if I could get linuxcnc to drive the board without
>>>> hacking the latch out.
>>>>
>>>> this is what I have found/figured out
>>>>
>>>> I think this is correct..  (this is with switch 1 on the interface board
>>>> set to
>>>> 'on' which puts the board into step/dir)
>>>>
>>>> x step pin 2
>>>> x dir pin 3
>>>> z step pin 4
>>>> z dir pin 5
>>>> index pin 12
>>>> estop pin 11
>>>> 100 ppr sensor pin 10
>>>> 74ls374 enable pin 14
>>>> 74ls374 clock pin 1
>>>>
>>>> I setup linuxcnc to send a pulse at every base period for the 'clock'
>>>> that latched the outputs of the chip. (thanks Jeff E for the idea) this
>>>> is using the
>>>> 'reset' option of the printer port that allows for a cycle within each
>>>> base period
>>>> the same feature that makes 'double step' work.  This allows me to
>>>> 'latch' the
>>>> 74ls374 each base period with the current step/dir pattern.  It seems to
>>>> work
>>>>
>>>> Now it took me a bit of tinkering to figure out that I didn't read the
>>>> above article
>>>> well enough to notice that you needed to set a switch to put the emco
>>>> interface
>>>> board into step/dir mode.  During this time I was flipping bits on the
>>>> printer port
>>>> to try to figure out why it wasn't working.  I think by default the
>>>> interface is setup
>>>> as phase drive.  (4 phases per stepper)  as I think I was flipping all 8
>>>> data bits on
>>>> the printer port and was getting stepper clunking.
>>>>
>>>> Well - the performace of these drives/steppers are pretty poor. (assuming
>>>> I have the timing right - and I didn't get too much time to play with
>>>> it.)  In the
>>>> above article they talk about around 20ipm is about max.  That is what I 
>>>> was
>>>> seeing - plus there is a weird interaction when you run both axis at once.
>>>> (they get quite a bit noisier for some reason).  Now it could be that I
>>>> don't quite
>>>> have the timing correct - like maybe the step/dir needs to be inverted or
>>>> or something - I will play with it more.
>>>>
>>>> I would also like to switch it back to non-step/dir mode.  (phase drive
>>>> maybe?)
>>>> because there might be a reason the original software used it.. (better
>>>> performance?)  plus I think I have the original software and would like
>>>> to try
>>>> it out also.  (need to setup a pure dos machine to test)
>>>>
>>>> lathe
>>>> http://www.electronicsam.com/images/emco/emcoclose.JPG
>>>> interface/drive
>>>> http://www.electronicsam.com/images/emco/interfaceanddrive.JPG
>>>>
>>>> sam
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>>>>
>>>> Build for Windows Store.
>>>>
>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Emc-users mailing list
>>>> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
>>> Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
>>> Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
>>> Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Emc-users mailing list
>>> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>>>
>>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
>> Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
>> Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
>> Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>> _______________________________________________
>> Emc-users mailing list
>> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
> Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
> Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
> Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to