On 8/30/2014 8:40 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > I might be tempted to set it up locally just so I'd be ready if and when > it actually arrives at the cat5 connector on my cable modem, but I've no > knowledge of ipv6 having a private address block that will not pass thru a > router without a NAT setup in the router. The unrouteable blocks of ipv4 > have far more security aspects and if that feature is not carried over to > ipv6, security is going to be a hell of a lot bigger problem. NSA of > course will love it.
Unique Local Addresses. http://www.networkworld.com/article/2228449/microsoft-subnet/ipv6-addressing--subnets--private-addresses.html --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
