On Sunday 31 August 2014 02:55:34 Gregg Eshelman did opine And Gene did reply: > On 8/30/2014 8:40 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > I might be tempted to set it up locally just so I'd be ready if and > > when it actually arrives at the cat5 connector on my cable modem, > > but I've no knowledge of ipv6 having a private address block that > > will not pass thru a router without a NAT setup in the router. The > > unrouteable blocks of ipv4 have far more security aspects and if > > that feature is not carried over to ipv6, security is going to be a > > hell of a lot bigger problem. NSA of course will love it. > > Unique Local Addresses. > > http://www.networkworld.com/article/2228449/microsoft-subnet/ipv6-addre > ssing--subnets--private-addresses.html > Message marked important, for future reference when I can switch mental gears away from hal setup code.
Thanks Gregg. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene> US V Castleman, SCOTUS, Mar 2014 is grounds for Impeaching SCOTUS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
