On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:19 AM, andy pugh <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Well ,if that worked then a CNC version would.
> My concern would be with the torsional stiffness of the pull-rod. I
> think that the rifling lead might always have to be largely set by the
> cutter itself.
>

Having zero experience with this process may hamper my thoughts but here
goes anyway.
I agree with Andy about the torsional stiffness. I don't believe there is
any way to overcome that limitation.
I don't think suspending the second end will add enough stiffness to allow
controlling the lead in any meaningful way.
I do think suspending the second end would have benefits. Torsionally float
the second end and measure the torsional rotation. Use the measurement to
control the rotation of the pulling end. This would allow the truest cutter
lead rotation and cutter orientation through the barrel.

>
> --
> atp
> If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
> http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
>

thanks
Stuart
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.  
Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to