On Tuesday 17 November 2015 11:35:34 John Kasunich wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015, at 11:10 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 November 2015 10:44:02 John Thornton wrote:
> > > You can use the ruler from a square...
> >
> > A foot out, my square is in 1/16ths.  For this, that never gets to
> > rotate speed so it won't fly. ;-) I go by the errors I see.  If the
> > right hand finger is to narrow, my board width is too big & vice
> > versa.
>
> It doesn't matter what the markings on the square are.  It just
> matters how long it is from end to end.
>
> Just to be clear - we are talking about using the ruler from a
> combination square.
>
> Hold a scrap against one edge of your board.  Put one end of the
> ruler against the scrap.  Put the back end of your dial caliper
> against the other end of the ruler.  That's 12 inches.  Open the
> calipers so that the "depth gage" rod extends back towards the board
> and touches the edge.  If the calipers read 1.366", then the board is
> 12.000 - 1.366 = 10.634" wide.
>
> If the ruler isn't exactly 12" it might not matter.  If you are trying
> to tell if one board is 0.050" wider than another, the length of the
> ruler cancels out.  If one board reads 1.366 on the caliper and the
> next one reads 1.380, the second board is 0.014" narrower than the
> first one.
>
> Actually, an even easier way (for boards less than 9" or so) is to
> leave the ruler in the combination square.  Set the blade of the
> square so it sticks out as far as possible on the 90 degree side - as
> long as it sticks out more than the width of the board you are good. 
> Now you can hold the head of the square against one edge of the board,
> and use the depth rod of the caliper to measure back from the end of
> the square blade to the other edge of the board.  All measurements are
> relative, just don't move the square blade in the head.
>
> On further thought, the square blade doesn't need to stick beyond the
> end of the wood.  You can place the end of the calipers against the
> wood and extend the depth rod back to meet the end of the square.
> That has the advantage that you add the square length and the
> caliper reading, so bigger caliper readings mean bigger boards.  The
> other way makes you subtract, so things read backwards.

I had something very similar in mind, but didn't make the connection 
between a square, and the 12" ruler out of a tri-square.  I kept coming 
up with my 18x24 framing square. :(

That ruler from a tri-square I believe would work quite nicely.  Thank 
you John.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Give your users amazing mobile app experiences with Intel XDK.
Use one codebase in this all-in-one HTML5 development environment.
Design, debug & build mobile apps & 2-D/3-D games for multiple OSs.
Then get your creation into app stores sooner, with many ways to monetize.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=254741551&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to