On 20.10.16 12:41, andy pugh wrote:
> On 20 October 2016 at 10:55, Erik Christiansen <dva...@internode.on.net> 
> wrote:
> > Mix in a Udoo X86 board as the interface host? (It all stays small and
> > low-power.)          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rSYsShm69o
> 
> I bought a Udoo as part of the Kickstarter, and have had it for quite
> a long time now.
> I did try to get an RT-PREEMPT kernel running on it, but I can't
> remember if I ever got it working.

Was the graphics as responsive as promoted, just as a desktop host?
Then it'd be an option for the UI half of the sandwich, with BBB as the
other, I figure. (Neither is the whole meal.)

> I think I lost interest when I found something I didn't like about the
> interface between the PC and the Arduino from a real-time
> point-of-view.

Pretty much every discussion of a split system has recognised that the
whole intent is to contain real-time processes entirely on one machine
(whether single or multiple core), so AIUI, only semi-real-time commands
would need to be sent across.

> (That and I have too many projects and didn't need the Udoo for anything)

A surfeit of projects isn't the luxury it's cracked up to be. It's a
bugger getting any of them finished.

Erik
(Better send this now. I think we lost a phase. The lights are dim, and
the ADSL modem had to reboot. These storms seem to be sweeping in
weekly now, but each tree can fall only once.)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to