I always thought SATA was a silly idea. Change from a parallel interface that 
handles a whole byte at a time (or two or four bytes for various SCSI types) to 
an interface that handles one bit at a time, requiring buffers to split up and 
assemble bytes to pass onto the rest of the computer that does things in 
parallel. To counter the physical bandwidth reduction, ramp up the speed those 
single bits are moved around. 
But it turns out there are practical limits to how fast single bits can be 
shifted using electricity. Solution? Back to parallel, sort of. Put a whole 
bunch of serial links side by side, and make it a scalable arrangement where 1 
to 16 serial links can be used per device.
When will they give up on electricity for bit shifting and connect peripherals 
with fiber optic links? Have the core light interface engine right close to the 
CPU with a 256 bit (or wider) electrical bus. Fiber optic links embedded in the 
motherboard lead to peripheral slots, which also have electrical connections 
for a power bus. Have other light connectors for cables to storage and other 
peripherals.
RAM could stay on a wide, parallel, electric bus. Reducing bus width and 
cranking the speed for RAM has already proven to be underwhelming. RAMBUS ran 
on a 16 bit bus at a higher clock to hit higher transfer speeds than 32bit wide 
SDRAM. There was also a 32 bit wide version of RDRAM, an attempt to keep up 
with later DDR-SDRAM versions. RDRAM had higher latency (much higher with 
certain sorts of memory access patterns), higher cost to manufacture, and 
higher power usage which produced more heat. Making light connected RAM modules 
would make them more expensive due to the need to have light<>electricity 
conversion systems on each module.
Perhaps individual LRAM chips could be designed with the conversion integrated 
and cost no more to manufacture. Such integration may be required for other 
peripherals to make a light bus worth doing.

    On Saturday, October 28, 2017, 1:18:26 AM MDT, Chris Albertson 
<[email protected]> wrote:  

BTW these SSDs that have the same physical shape as a hard drive as
just a transitional technology.  They are good for upgrades old
computers.    But with new computers they eliminate the SATA-III
interface and connect the FLASH chip directly to the PCIe bus.  SATA
has become a huge bottleneck  
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to