On Thursday 30 November 2017 10:27:39 andy pugh wrote:

> On 30 November 2017 at 14:13, Gene Heskett <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> > Yes, and its math I should have explored, but I had no clue that
> > there was that big a geardown in the head, even in high gear, before
> > I ordered that 1000 line encoder. That says the motor, running wide
> > open, is turning about 20 k rpms.
>
> There is something very wrong with your maths still, I think.
>
> Your 7000:1 gear ratio is simply wrong. I think you divided
> revolutions by counts (I recall you saying that encoder resolution
> didn't matter, but you were using rawcounts, so it most certainly
> does).

Of course it does. I was counting rawcounts based on the motor encoders 
1000 count PER MOTORS REV, over a span of 100 turns of the spindle, 
getting about 7161.1 rawcounts PER TURN OF THE SPINDLE.  Double that +- 
a slight fudge, for the slower spindle gear, or 14300.16. But theres 
certainly room for a 7 something or 14 something gear ratio.

> So, a 1000:1 error there. (There isn't _room_ in the head for a 7000:1
> gear ratio)
>
> Also, you keep confusing RPM and Revs Per Second.

Not impossible at all, Andy.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to