On Monday 11 December 2017 08:51:42 Todd Zuercher wrote: > If you want to use a hal command, like sets or setp, in a g-code file; > I think you will have to put it in a custom m-code or something like > that.
m64p##/m65p## at the right place in all the callable subroutines will take care of that after upping the motions num_dio to 12, but because the machine needs to be homed before the mdi commands will be run, it sure slows the pace of development. A lot. And its at the cost of that increased wear on the machine. It can't be tested from showconfig with a sets because the "signal already has a writer". Sigh. And because of the lack of meaningful names in going thru motion to get the job done, thats bound to be fraught with mistakes to be corrected as they are found. We'll get there, but... I reserve the right to mutter, a lot. Thank $Diety nobody hears me but me... Thanks Todd. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
