> On Jan 18, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Gene Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Thursday 18 January 2018 10:41:50 Kirk Wallace wrote:
> 
>> On 01/17/2018 11:45 AM, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> On Jan 17, 2018, at 10:43 AM, Kirk Wallace
>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I did a rewrite a while back:
>>>>> http://wallacecompany.com/tmp/G76/G76-7b.cc 
>>>>> <http://wallacecompany.com/tmp/G76/G76-7b.cc>
>>>>> <http://wallacecompany.com/tmp/G76/G76-7b.cc 
>>>>> <http://wallacecompany.com/tmp/G76/G76-7b.cc>>
> Interesting Kirk.
> 
> However it generates a couple of questions, first of which is that this 
> looks as if it could be duplicated in a gcode file with the use of named 
> subroutines. Given the speed of available machinery, would it make any 
> diff in execution time?
> 
> Second, this seems workable only for std 60 degree sidewall threads, so 
> it would have to grow a knowledge of acme threads in order to solve Tom 
> E's problem.

Why is his code only good for 60 degree threads?

> 
> Tom, can you give the math that describes your single point tools 
> geometry? I think the side angles,(s/b 15 degrees for /most/ acme's) the 
> width of the point those angles pivot on (here I'd assume the previously 
> quoted .125") which implies the actual width of your tool, at the 50% of 
> cut depth point is then .0630", the extra half a thou being just enough 
> backlash to allow a .0625" width tooth to turn easy if well lubed.


The tool geometry is shown here (IAT-1500-8):  
https://bgp.nu/~tom/pub/IAT-1500-8.png

-Tom

> 
> So the angles could pivot at that width point, then what is the actual 
> depth, from which the width of the tools flat tip could be determined?
> 
> I'd assume (that word is scary, actual practice has made a fool of me 
> before) that the tools tooth is actually a few thou longer so that the 
> tool's shank would clear the top of the already cut tooth as its making 
> the final and spring passes.
> 
> Thoughts everybody?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to