On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 4:37 PM Gene Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Quite simplified, covers the basics but makes little or no mention of the > resolvers speed limits. So in both cases, the encoder is king, and much > cheaper to implement. > > I only have resolvers because I got them used, so encoders aren't always cheaper. STMBL reads resolvers. I have some motors I considered converting to encoders, but that doesn't make sense now. But resolvers have certainly fallen out of favor from their peak. I'm sure they aren't going away. I have some motors with three phase resolvers, apparently used for commutation and position. Eric Keller Boalsburg, Pennsylvania ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
